Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 00:01

Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
What is your review of Hartley`s High School, Kolkata?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Owen Wilson Brings Clever, Funny “Stick” in Under Par - Roger Ebert
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Man accused of writing Trump assassination letters was framed, officials say - BBC
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
$200 for a Refurbished MacBook Air Is a Tough Deal to Beat - PCMag
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Frigid Exoplanet in Strange Orbit Imaged by NASA’s Webb - NASA Science (.gov)